Power / cost allocation · checked 10 September 2026

Power / cost allocation

A verdict applies only to the wording shown.

Company claims are shown as stated; they are not findings.

Power / cost allocation · IN · sabey-indianapolis

Partially supported

Common reading; no one is quoted

Checked 10 September 2026

One Indianapolis developer cost commitment proves no Indiana data center can affect other customers' electricity costs.

What the evidence supports

The reviewed Indianapolis filing says Sabey will pay costs related to the project's substation, generation, transmission and distribution needs. That is meaningful site-specific evidence; it does not establish every tariff, wholesale-market effect or project in Indiana.

Still unknown

None recorded

Confidence: medium — Gov. record; Institution · 1 sources

Indianapolis petitioner appendix, cases 2025-CAP-856 / 2025-CVR-856 → Gov. record

Open full claim → History (0) →

Evidence details

  1. Indianapolis petitioner appendix, cases 2025-CAP-856 / 2025-CVR-856 → Gov. record

    Exact location https://indianapolis-in.municodemeetings.com/sites/indianapolis-in.municodemeetings.com/files/fileattachments/mdc_hearing_examiner/meeting/5368/2025-cap-856_2025-cvr-856_petitioner_appendix_mdc_3-18-26_final.pdf

    What it supports No narrower support statement recorded.

    Retrieved 10 September 2026

Counterevidence

None recorded.

Next check

None recorded

History

None recorded.

Correction · 11 September 2026 · internal review

sabey-indianapolis → record

Changed correction

From Previous value

To status was 'Approved; construction not verified' while the only linked source was the petitioner's appendix, which shows a request rather than a decision. The verification source is now the commission's hearing results. Prior verification_url: https://indianapolis-in.municodemeetings.com/sites/indianapolis-in.municodemeetings.com/files/fileattachments/mdc_hearing_examiner/meeting/5368/2025-cap-856_2025-cvr-856_petitioner_appendix_mdc_3-18-26_final.pdf; prior verified_fields: local filing, cooling claim, cost commitment.

Why status was 'Approved; construction not verified' while the only linked source was the petitioner's appendix, which shows a request rather than a decision. The verification source is now the commission's hearing results. Prior verification_url: https://indianapolis-in.municodemeetings.com/sites/indianapolis-in.municodemeetings.com/files/fileattachments/mdc_hearing_examiner/meeting/5368/2025-cap-856_2025-cvr-856_petitioner_appendix_mdc_3-18-26_final.pdf; prior verified_fields: local filing, cooling claim, cost commitment.

Evidence None recorded

Data + actions

This claim as JSON →

DataCenterData Indiana project index · Related DataCenterData page

Report an error → About intake, record sabey-indianapolis and claim sabey-cost-allocation-generalized.