National coverage framework · last reviewed 10 September 2026
All 50 states are visible. Most are not counted—yet.
This is a research coverage map, not a claim that DataCenterData already knows every U.S. facility. Indiana has a statewide first pass. Ohio has separate major-project and physical-facility seed inventories plus a reviewed claim desk. Three other states have selected evidence. Blank statewide counts mean “not researched,” never zero.
Live filtering is unavailable. The machine-readable coverage file remains available below.
Coverage parity
Same questions. Honest gaps.
Indiana and Ohio now share one target field standard. A check below means evidence exists for at least some records—not that statewide coverage is complete.
| Evidence area | Indiana | Ohio | Required before comparable totals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projects + facilities | 8 reviewed projects; 21 facility research records | 17 reviewed projects; 29 facility/building records | Reconcile the full candidate queue to campuses, buildings and provider presences. |
| Lifecycle + history | Withdrawn/expired records retained; former-name audit incomplete | Current, preleasing and unresolved stages separated; acquisition/closure audit incomplete | Preserve proposals, renames, acquisitions, closures and withdrawals as dated events. |
| Power + scale | Partial | Partial | Keep IT capacity, service request, grid draw and measured load separate. |
| Water + cooling | Selected projects; facility coverage sparse | Selected claims and permits; measured use sparse | Separate design, permit, withdrawal, consumption, discharge and source-water mix. |
| Jobs + fiscal outcomes | Selected projects/dossiers | Selected projects, statute and New Albany dossier | Reconcile promises with actual payroll, taxes, incentives claimed and public spending. |
| Claim checking | Embedded in dossiers | 9-item state claim desk | Use the same verdict vocabulary and dated evidence standard. |
What “every” can honestly mean
We can target every evidence-identified facility, project and historical lifecycle record after a dated audit of operators, government records, dockets, permits, tax records, archives and directory leads. We cannot prove that an undisclosed private server room does not exist. Completeness is therefore a published audit boundary—not a marketing adjective.
Open data: U.S. coverage JSON · common state-data standard. Next priority states are Virginia, Texas, Georgia, Arizona and Washington; priority is a research queue, not a completeness claim.