Cooling + water · checked 11 September 2026

Cooling + water

A verdict applies only to the wording shown.

Company claims are shown as stated; they are not findings.

Cooling + water · IN · aws-new-carlisle

Unknown

Common reading; no one is quoted

Checked 11 September 2026

Source-water mix, permitted quantity, and current metered withdrawal/consumption at AWS New Carlisle.

What the evidence supports

The reviewed AWS-authored account does not establish source-water mix, a permit quantity, or current metered withdrawal/consumption. The 18-million-gallon figure is a company full-buildout projection tracked on claim:aws-new-carlisle:water.

Still unknown

Source water, permitted quantity, current metered withdrawal/consumption, and completion.

Confidence: medium — AWS-authored opinion hosted by the South Bend Regional Chamber · 1 sources

Open full claim → History (0) →

Evidence details

  1. AWS economic-development account → Chamber

    Exact location https://www.sbrchamber.com/news/2026/07/09/default/amazon-s-investment-is-building-lasting-opportunity-for-st.-joseph-county/

    What it supports No narrower support statement recorded.

    Retrieved 11 September 2026 · published 2026-07-09

Counterevidence

None recorded.

Next check

None recorded

History

None recorded.

Correction · 11 September 2026 · internal review

aws-new-carlislepermanent jobs

Changed correction

From At least 1,000 baseline; AWS's own July 2026 account says nearly 1,000 operations staff hired; an undated Chamber project page says 1,056 full-time AWS employees

To 2026-09-11: status was 'supported-as-delivered' with value 'At least 1,000 baseline; 1,056 full-time AWS employees later reported'. The company-linked counts sit on either side of the baseline (AWS op-ed: 'We have also hired nearly 1,000 operations staff so far'; Chamber page: '1,056 full-time AWS employees', undated), so the reviewed record does not support a delivery conclusion. Evidence level unchanged.

Why 2026-09-11: status was 'supported-as-delivered' with value 'At least 1,000 baseline; 1,056 full-time AWS employees later reported'. The company-linked counts sit on either side of the baseline (AWS op-ed: 'We have also hired nearly 1,000 operations staff so far'; Chamber page: '1,056 full-time AWS employees', undated), so the reviewed record does not support a delivery conclusion. Evidence level unchanged.

Evidence Evidence →

Correction · 11 September 2026 · internal review

aws-new-carlislepermanent_jobs

Changed correction

From Previous value

To status was 'supported-as-delivered' with value 'At least 1,000 baseline; 1,056 full-time AWS employees later reported'. The company-linked counts sit on either side of the baseline, so the reviewed record does not support a delivery conclusion.

Why status was 'supported-as-delivered' with value 'At least 1,000 baseline; 1,056 full-time AWS employees later reported'. The company-linked counts sit on either side of the baseline, so the reviewed record does not support a delivery conclusion.

Evidence None recorded

Data + actions

This claim as JSON →

Report an error → About intake, record aws-new-carlisle and claim claim:aws-new-carlisle:cooling-water.