Oklahoma research coverage.

Source references: OK-S0007, OK-S0008, OK-S0010

• Oklahoma's statutory data center sales tax incentive and any recipient or certification list were not examined; the only lead to them, a Frontier article, was not opened.
• The web search budget for this session was exhausted before Oklahoma began, so no search engine query could be run for this state; every source was reached by following a Compute Atlas source URL or by constructing an agency URL directly.
• Oklahoma Department of Commerce incentive programme reports, Quality Jobs Program records and the Oklahoma Tax Commission ad valorem exemption reports were not reached.

Source references: OK-S0011, OK-S0012

• Case Processing Online is an Oracle APEX application that returns only a shell to a plain fetch, so no Oklahoma cause number, filing, tariff or order was read.
• No PSO or OG&E large-load tariff, special contract or electric service agreement was obtained.
• The Southwest Power Pool interconnection and large-load queues were not examined at all, so no Oklahoma candidate carries an interconnection figure.

Source references: OK-S0013

• deq.ok.gov failed TLS certificate verification, so no air permit, permit application, public notice, water or construction permit was read.
• Behind-the-meter generation at Oklahoma data centers, which the Governor's remarks in an operator release describe as enabled by new legislation, could not be checked against any permit.
• No municipal building or grading permit portal was reached for any Oklahoma city.

Source references: OK-S0002, OK-S0003, OK-S0004, OK-S0005, OK-S0006

• Only one city, Piedmont, was worked at the municipal level. Tulsa, Oklahoma City, Stillwater, Muskogee, Owasso, Claremore, Coweta, Inola, Lawton and Alva were not.
• No county assessor or GIS parcel record was opened; the parcel account numbers recorded come from a PUD design statement, not from the assessor.
• The Piedmont planning agenda packet, annexation petition and conceptual site plan published on the same portal were not opened.
• Whether either Piedmont PUD was approved by the city council is not established; no minutes or approving ordinance was found.

Source references: OK-S0001

• No statewide Oklahoma registry of local development agreements or abatements was located, so this family cannot be swept the way Texas can.
• The Springboard Tax Incentive Agreement itself is referenced in the plan with a blank date and was not obtained, so no executed agreement is in evidence.
• Five-year ad valorem manufacturing exemption records held by the Oklahoma Tax Commission were not reached.

Source references: OK-S0015, OK-S0016

• Google, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services and Oracle location pages were not opened for Oklahoma.
• No colocation operator page (TierPoint, TulsaConnect, RACK59, ValorC3, Isocentric, OCOSA) was opened.
• Only one SEC filing was retrieved; IREN, Potentia and Jericho Energy Ventures filings naming Oklahoma sites were not.

Source references: OK-S0014

• Data Center Map, Baxtel, datacenters.com, Cloudscene and PeeringDB were not consulted.
• dcmap.us is cited by several Compute Atlas Oklahoma records and was not opened.
• About 16 Oklahoma records, mostly Tulsa and Oklahoma City colocation halls, were read but not worked up as candidates.

Source references: OK-S0009

• No primary cancellation, withdrawal or rescission record was obtained for any of the three; all three withdrawals rest on the dataset alone.
• No archived operator page, acquisition filing or demolition record was searched for Oklahoma.
• Renames and acquisitions were not systematically checked; the Core Scientific acquisition of Polaris DS LLC was found incidentally and remains unresolved against the Polaris Technologies facility.

Source references: OK-S0017

• No Oklahoma news source was opened at all.
• Local reporting on the Piedmont, Stillwater, Owasso and Coweta projects, which would carry hearing dates and vote outcomes, was not reached.