Michigan index · last changed 12 September 2026
Michigan research coverage.
See the available records, draft source-family audit and remaining research gaps. A state page is not a complete inventory of its data centers.
Research coverage
Research draft available; independent coverage review pending
Research draft available. Candidate findings and statewide coverage await independent review.
Draft source attempts: 2026-09-12 through 2026-09-12. These are draft audit dates, not a new independent check.
0 reviewed project/campus records; 0 reviewed facility/building records; 0 uncounted records. Inventories are non-additive.
Draft source-family roster and gaps
- economic development incentives — searched_partial
Source references: MI-S0012
- No Michigan Department of Treasury or Michigan Economic Development Corporation source was opened; the only attempted path returned 403 and 404.
- No list of certified Michigan enterprise data centres was obtained, so the state's incentive recipients are entirely absent from this packet.
- Whether the Saline Township PA 198 industrial development district was ever established was not checked.
- utility commission large load — searched_partial
Source references: MI-S0008, MI-S0009
- The MPSC case system is a JavaScript application and its filing index was not enumerated; only the single filing linked by the township was retrieved.
- Case U-21990, DTE 2025 Data Center Special Contracts, was identified but not opened.
- No Consumers Energy or Michigan municipal utility large-load filing was searched, so no utility-request figure exists for any Michigan candidate outside Van Buren Township.
- environmental construction permits — searched_partial
Source references: MI-S0004, MI-S0005, MI-S0006, MI-S0007
- No Michigan air Permit to Install number was obtained for any data centre, so the generator fleets that are documented for Illinois have no Michigan equivalent here.
- The EGLE site specific review for the Saline Township project is a scanned image and was not read.
- No EGLE water withdrawal registration, wetland permit number or NPDES permit was retrieved.
- The MiEnviro Portal was identified but not queried.
- municipal planning assessor gis — searched
Source references: MI-S0001, MI-S0002, MI-S0003, MI-S0010
- No county assessor or GIS parcel portal was queried in Michigan, so the only parcel identifier in this packet is the single PA 116 parcel quoted in the Saline consent judgment.
- No other Michigan municipality or township was visited; Lyon, Augusta, Frenchtown, Vevay, Dorr, Lowell and Gaines townships and the cities of Southfield, Lansing, Flint, Gibraltar, Dowagiac, Marshall and Ypsilanti were not reached.
- The Saline Township site plan sheets and the consent judgment exhibits beyond page 40 were not read.
- tax abatement development agreements — searched_partial
Source references: MI-S0011
- No PA 198 industrial facilities exemption certificate, PILOT or abatement instrument was retrieved for any Michigan site.
- Whether the Saline Township industrial development district was established is unknown.
- No state incentive agreement was reachable; see the incentives family.
- operator disclosures — searched_partial
Source references: MI-S0013, MI-S0014
- No hyperscaler location page was opened for Michigan; the three Microsoft township land positions rest on the dataset alone.
- Switch, Related Digital, Verrus, Metrobloks, Cloverleaf, Raeden and Hyperscale Data operator pages were not opened.
- Google's own Michigan announcement was identified through the township page but not read, so the 2.7 GW portfolio figure it is said to contain is not carried anywhere.
- open datasets directories — searched
Source references: MI-S0015
- No unlicensed directory was used, so no cross-reference of Michigan colocation facility counts was attempted.
- Nineteen Michigan dataset records, mostly small operating colocation facilities run by 123NET, US Signal and EdgeConneX plus the Oakland University, Prologis, Sansone, Solstice and Stantec proposals, were read only at summary level and were not turned into candidates.
- historical closures withdrawals names — searched_partial
Source references: MI-S0016
- No Michigan municipal denial, withdrawal or rescission file was retrieved directly; three of the four reversals rest on the dataset alone.
- The Deep Green Lansing status is contested between the dataset's two cited sources and no city record was obtained to settle it.
- No closed or demolished Michigan data centre was searched for, and no rename or acquisition history was traced beyond the Hyperscale Data conversion and the former McLouth Steel site name.
- news and other discovery — searched_partial
Source references: MI-S0017
- The web search budget for this session was exhausted partway through Michigan, so every Michigan source after that point had to be reached by direct URL from a document already in hand. No keyword news sweep of Michigan was possible.
No reviewed records published. This does not mean there are no data centers in this state.