Connecticut research coverage.

Source references: CT-S0001

• No public DECD register of qualified data center agreements or certificates was found; the page offers only staff contact details.
• Whether any DECD agreement has been executed, and with whom, could not be established from an opened source.

Source references: CT-S0002, CT-S0003, CT-S0004, CT-S0019, CT-S0020

• Both PURA docket entry points tried (CT-S0019, CT-S0020) failed, so no PURA large-load tariff, special contract or electric service agreement docket was searched.
• No ISO-NE or Eversource large-load interconnection queue record was consulted.

Source references: CT-S0011

• DEEP's permit-issuance and public-notice databases were not queried; only the programme pages were read.
• Municipal building and grading permit systems were not reachable (see the municipal family).
• No stormwater construction general permit registration list was searched.

Source references: CT-S0005, CT-S0006

• Norwalk, Waterford and Bozrah municipal sites (207.38.77.0/24 and 207.38.78.0/24 hosts) refused all connections, so no planning case file, zoning decision or building permit was read.
• The CAMA layer's Location and Parcel_ID fields are null for many Norwalk rows, so 6 Norden Place could not be matched; absence from the query is not evidence of absence on the ground.
• The assessor use code is the only screen applied; data centers coded under a generic commercial or industrial use would not appear.

Source references: CT-S0007, CT-S0008, CT-S0009, CT-S0010

• The executed Waterford host municipality fee agreement was never read (connection refused).
• The Bozrah draft agreement with NE Edge LLC was never read (timeout).
• No Connecticut tax-abatement, PILOT or development agreement outside the PA 21-1 host-fee mechanism was searched.

Source references: CT-S0012, CT-S0013

• Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Google, Meta, Oracle and Apple were not individually checked for Connecticut sites; none appeared in any source opened here.
• Colocation operators beyond CyrusOne (for example 365 Data Centers, Evocative, Digital Realty) were not swept.
• Ownership of the NYM5 building was not confirmed from an opened source.

Source references: CT-S0014

• Directory listings (Data Center Map, Baxtel, datacenters.com) were seen only in search results and were not opened, so a 16 MW figure they report for NYM5 is not recorded anywhere in this packet.

Source references: CT-S0015, CT-S0016, CT-S0017

• The Waterford town record of the termination was not retrieved; the newspaper account is paywalled and the supporting statement comes from an advocacy site.
• The Groton Town Council minutes or resolution discontinuing the NE Edge agreement were not retrieved.
• No search was made for older Connecticut data center closures, demolitions or renames before 2021.

Source references: CT-S0018

• No systematic Connecticut news sweep was run; news was used only to locate primary records.