California index · last changed 12 September 2026
California research coverage.
See the available records, draft source-family audit and remaining research gaps. A state page is not a complete inventory of its data centers.
Research coverage
Research draft available; independent coverage review pending
Research draft available. Candidate findings and statewide coverage await independent review.
Draft source attempts: 2026-09-12 through 2026-09-12. These are draft audit dates, not a new independent check.
0 reviewed project/campus records; 0 reviewed facility/building records; 0 uncounted records. Inventories are non-additive.
Draft source-family roster and gaps
- economic development incentives — searched_partial
Source references: CA-S0036, CA-S0037
- The GO-Biz California Business Portal incentives page (CA-S0037) could not be read: TLS handshake failure.
- California Competes Tax Credit award lists were not opened, so any data center recipients there are unknown.
- No county or city enterprise-zone, community-benefit or fee-credit programme was surveyed.
- utility commission large load — searched_partial
Source references: CA-S0002, CA-S0003
- PG&E's Electric Rule 30 transmission-interconnection application and its interim approval of 24 July 2025 were identified in search results but not opened.
- No Silicon Valley Power electric service agreement, large-load tariff or City of Santa Clara council agenda report was read; the city web server blocked the projects listing (CA-S0038).
- SMUD, LADWP, Vernon Public Utility and Pittsburg Power Company large-load records were not searched.
- CAISO and utility interconnection queues were not examined.
- environmental construction permits — searched
Source references: CA-S0004, CA-S0005, CA-S0006, CA-S0007, CA-S0008, CA-S0009, CA-S0010, CA-S0011, CA-S0012, CA-S0013, CA-S0014, CA-S0015, CA-S0016, CA-S0017, CA-S0018, CA-S0019, CA-S0020, CA-S0021, CA-S0022, CA-S0030, CA-S0031
- SCAQMD and SMAQMD permit databases were not searched at all, so Los Angeles basin and Sacramento generator permits are missing.
- BAAQMD's own permit and public-notice database was not queried directly; only two BAAQMD documents reached through CEQAnet and the air district's CEQA letters directory were read.
- Water withdrawal, discharge and stormwater construction general permit notices were not searched.
- CEC opt-in certification and Application for Certification cases above 100 MW were not enumerated; one such certification is reported for the AVAIO Pittsburg site and was not read.
- municipal planning assessor gis — searched_partial
Source references: CA-S0001, CA-S0023, CA-S0024, CA-S0025, CA-S0026, CA-S0027, CA-S0029, CA-S0032, CA-S0033, CA-S0038
- CEQAnet's free-text query parameter is not honoured by the server on a plain GET, so no systematic keyword sweep of California CEQA documents for 'data center' was possible (CA-S0033).
- The City of Santa Clara web server returned HTTP 403 (CA-S0038), so no Santa Clara planning file numbers or Silicon Valley Power agreements were read for the ten-plus Santa Clara projects in this packet.
- No county assessor or GIS parcel portal was queried for any California county; every parcel number here comes from a CEC or CEQAnet description.
- San Jose's Legistar council record, where the Prologis STEM Park item would sit, was not reached.
- Los Angeles, Irvine, El Segundo, Vernon, Newark, Fremont, Sacramento, San Diego and Imperial County planning portals were not searched.
- tax abatement development agreements — searched_partial
Source references:
- No executed development agreement, ground lease or community benefits agreement document was opened.
- The San Jose exclusive negotiating agreement or ground lease for the city-owned STEM Park parcel was not located on the city site.
- Redevelopment successor agency and infrastructure financing district records were not searched.
- operator disclosures — searched_partial
Source references: CA-S0040, CA-S0041
- Microsoft, Google, Meta, Oracle and Apple location disclosures were not opened; the Microsoft sites here come from CEC and CEQAnet records instead.
- Colocation operator location pages (Equinix, Digital Realty, CoreSite, STACK, Prime, NTT, Centersquare, Cologix, EdgeConneX, QTS, Serverfarm, Csquare, T5, DataBank, ScaleMatrix) were not fetched; their facilities here rest on the Compute Atlas extract.
- No operator sustainability or investor filing was checked for California-specific capacity.
- open datasets directories — searched
Source references: CA-S0034, CA-S0035
- Data Center Map was not opened (CA-S0035); no directory listing was used as evidence.
- Compute Atlas leads not individually examined beyond the extract fields were not turned into candidates, including most Equinix, Digital Realty, Csquare, EdgeConneX, Lumen and CoreSite entries.
- No cross-check against FracTracker, Baxtel, datacenters.com, Cloudscene or PeeringDB was attempted.
- historical closures withdrawals names — searched
Source references: CA-S0028, CA-S0039
- No City of Coachella ordinance, resolution or minutes could be read, so the agreement termination and the reported permanent data center prohibition rest on a dataset lead only.
- The City of Monterey Park letter documenting the 1977 Saturn Street cancellation timed out (CA-S0039).
- Older California closures and demolitions — 1990s and 2000s carrier hotels, Herakles, Above.net and Savvis-era sites, and any data center lost to redevelopment — were not searched.
- No archived or Wayback retrieval was attempted for retired operator pages.
- news and other discovery — searched_partial
Source references:
- The Little Hoover Commission report and the Assembly oversight hearing materials were not read.
- No systematic sweep of California local news for data center moratoria was done; moratoria are reported in Coachella and Imperial County and neither was confirmed from a government record.
No reviewed records published. This does not mean there are no data centers in this state.